<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lean Body Mass:  The Best Presentation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.smbtrendwire.com/2006/09/30/lean-body-mass-the-best-presentation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.smbtrendwire.com/2006/09/30/lean-body-mass-the-best-presentation/</link>
	<description>Small Business Trends Radio features interviews and open discussions with today's small business experts on a variety of topics. Guests include a mix of influential individuals who speak on issues of the day important to the small business market; and business owners who speak from a \"been there, done that\" point of view, offering insider tips and advice.Small Business Trends Radio is broadcast LIVE every Tuesday from 1:30 PM until 2PM EST.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 02:32:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack</title>
		<link>http://www.smbtrendwire.com/2006/09/30/lean-body-mass-the-best-presentation/comment-page-1/#comment-19528</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Oct 2006 16:13:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smbtrendwire.com/2006/09/30/lean-body-mass-the-best-presentation/#comment-19528</guid>
		<description>Sarah, the A-list celebs can get away with a non-lean body mass.  Mere Mortals cannot.

Remember, I would not disagree with your analysis of the double digit dress size. 

Not that I would notice such sizing on another woman.  See:

http://www.charmaineyoest.com/2006/05/the_complete_married_mans_guid.php

Thank you for your insight,
Jack</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sarah, the A-list celebs can get away with a non-lean body mass.  Mere Mortals cannot.</p>
<p>Remember, I would not disagree with your analysis of the double digit dress size. </p>
<p>Not that I would notice such sizing on another woman.  See:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.charmaineyoest.com/2006/05/the_complete_married_mans_guid.php" rel="nofollow">http://www.charmaineyoest.com/2006/05/the_complete_married_mans_guid.php</a></p>
<p>Thank you for your insight,<br />
Jack</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sarah</title>
		<link>http://www.smbtrendwire.com/2006/09/30/lean-body-mass-the-best-presentation/comment-page-1/#comment-19272</link>
		<dc:creator>sarah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Oct 2006 21:22:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smbtrendwire.com/2006/09/30/lean-body-mass-the-best-presentation/#comment-19272</guid>
		<description>Jack:

With all respect I can&#039;t begin to express how much I disagree with you.

Consider for instance these &quot;non-rail,&quot; overtly curvy celeb and business moguls...

Oprah
Katie Couric
Susan Arnold (P&amp;G)
Ann Livermore (HP)
Sir Elton John.
Scarlett Johansson (recently voted the most beautiful woman by Esquire Mag)
Emeril Lagasse 
Rachael Ray
Rosie O&#039;Donnell

- sarah</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jack:</p>
<p>With all respect I can&#8217;t begin to express how much I disagree with you.</p>
<p>Consider for instance these &#8220;non-rail,&#8221; overtly curvy celeb and business moguls&#8230;</p>
<p>Oprah<br />
Katie Couric<br />
Susan Arnold (P&amp;G)<br />
Ann Livermore (HP)<br />
Sir Elton John.<br />
Scarlett Johansson (recently voted the most beautiful woman by Esquire Mag)<br />
Emeril Lagasse<br />
Rachael Ray<br />
Rosie O&#8217;Donnell</p>
<p>- sarah</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack</title>
		<link>http://www.smbtrendwire.com/2006/09/30/lean-body-mass-the-best-presentation/comment-page-1/#comment-18938</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Oct 2006 15:45:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smbtrendwire.com/2006/09/30/lean-body-mass-the-best-presentation/#comment-18938</guid>
		<description>Chris, you are so right -- the Lean Body Mass is recent &quot;demand&quot; of our culture and times.

Women depicted in paintings of an earlier era are described (favorably) as &quot;Reuben-isk.&quot;

Benjamin Franklin is usually pictured as rotund.  And could the 300+lbs Taft get elected president these days?

But times are different and we seem to now require a different image.  See:
http://www.yoest.org/archives/2005/09/leadership_and_honore_a_revers.php</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris, you are so right &#8212; the Lean Body Mass is recent &#8220;demand&#8221; of our culture and times.</p>
<p>Women depicted in paintings of an earlier era are described (favorably) as &#8220;Reuben-isk.&#8221;</p>
<p>Benjamin Franklin is usually pictured as rotund.  And could the 300+lbs Taft get elected president these days?</p>
<p>But times are different and we seem to now require a different image.  See:<br />
<a href="http://www.yoest.org/archives/2005/09/leadership_and_honore_a_revers.php" rel="nofollow">http://www.yoest.org/archives/2005/09/leadership_and_honore_a_revers.php</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.smbtrendwire.com/2006/09/30/lean-body-mass-the-best-presentation/comment-page-1/#comment-18937</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Oct 2006 15:30:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smbtrendwire.com/2006/09/30/lean-body-mass-the-best-presentation/#comment-18937</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s a shame - but true.  And your audience&#039;s perception is everything if you want to be successful.  What I often wonder is - how did these perceptions come to be?  Who taught us to associate all of these negative terms to the condition?  I suppose it&#039;s a number of different reasons - but all disappointing nonetheless.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a shame &#8211; but true.  And your audience&#8217;s perception is everything if you want to be successful.  What I often wonder is &#8211; how did these perceptions come to be?  Who taught us to associate all of these negative terms to the condition?  I suppose it&#8217;s a number of different reasons &#8211; but all disappointing nonetheless.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

